Tuesday, November 13, 2012

In Honor of Veterans Day, Cornellians Thank Military | The Cornell ...

Speakers and attendees reflected on the importance of honoring members of the military at Cornell?s annual Veterans Day ceremony in Sage Chapel Friday.

After the presentation of colors and Cassidy Molina?s ?15 performance of the National Anthem, Rev. Rick Bair, a Lutheran Chaplain of Cornell United Religious Works, emphasized the selflessness of servicemen and women.

?We owe a debt of more than gratitude to those who have sacrificed and those who have made the ultimate sacrifice, deeming their lives less precious than the lives of strangers in need,? Bair said.

During the 40-minute ceremony ?? which was sponsored by Cornell?s Office of Workforce Diversity, Equity and Life Quality and the University?s ROTC programs ? retired U.S. ?Force Major General Michael Hall ?68 spoke about the military?s role in American society. He said the military should ?project determination? to other nations and emphasized the importance of honorable behavior among its members.?

?What you do in times of peace is just as important as what you do in times of war,? he said.?

Hall, who served in an air campaign in Kuwait during the first Gulf War before retiring in 1995, also stressed the influence that ROTC membership had on his time at Cornell. He advised his 200-person audiencee ?? composed primarily of ROTC members and their families ?? to take advantage of the diverse opportunities offered at Cornell.

But Hall?s tone was somber as he described the hardships faced by members of the military, citing in particular his grandfather?s wounds in World War I from a mustard gas attack.

?Take a moment to look to your left and right, then imagine that all the people you see had been killed,? Hall said.

Cornell IT security liaison David Juers, a Vietnam War veteran who attended Friday?s ceremony, said parts of Hall?s address ?? including his point that military action should be a last resort if peacekeeping efforts are unsuccessful ?? resonated with him.?

?I recognized a couple things, like military action being a result of failure in other areas,? he said.?

Cadet Carrissa Bartlett ?13, who organized the event, said she thought it was a success.

?I think it ran very smoothly,? Bartlett said. ?The speaker was amazing. I liked what he talked about. I thought it was interesting that he linked past conflicts to current engagements.??

In his address, Hall also commented on the impermanence of military solutions. He urged audience members to force their representatives to ?answer the hard questions.??

?Today, our superbly trained military asks less of us than ever before,? he said. ?Are we ready to support the real needs of veterans when they return from wars we can ignore??

Source: http://www.cornellsun.com/section/news/content/2012/11/12/honor-veterans-day-cornellians-thank-military

this means war bobby brown suzanne somers colbert colbert report legionnaires disease underwear bomber

Monday, November 12, 2012

HitmanPro - Mark Loman | Welcome to bnetTV

bnetTV speaks with Mark Loman of SurfRight regarding Hitman Pro at the 2012 Broadband World Forum held in Amsterdam and gives us a overview of the company and product.

Hitman Pro was developed in 2004 by Mark Loman from The Netherlands. As system administrator / security specialist he felt the need for an automated tool that would be able to effectively clean computers that were infected by spyware. In those days, spyware was still pretty new and except for a few specialized companies, there were no tools to remove spyware.

The first version of Hitman Pro was a simple script that downloaded and executed a couple of anti spyware programs, such as SpyBot, Ad-Aware, Spy Sweeper, Spyware Doctor, NOD32. Hitman Pro became very popular, especially in The Netherlands with more than 3 million users.
In later versions, the automation of the abovementioned programs became more complex as the vendors expanded the features of their software, making it more complicated to automate the execution of the program. Plus an increase in the number of false positives caused by these programs, resulted in the decision to develop a completely new version from scratch.

Mark Loman founded SurfRight B.V. in The Netherlands in 2006, and hired a few security experts and software developers for the development of new and innovative security products.
The first project in 2006 was a research project to study the common characteristics of malware using behavioural analysis (fuzzy logic). The results of this research would be the foundation for the new anti malware product Hitman Pro 3.

Caretaker Antispam was released in 2007, the first product of SurfRight using their own technology.
Caretaker Antispam's filter is trained centrally, not by the user so when spammers find a new spamming method, the filter is updated automatically by the team of SurfRight experts. This mechanism ensures that Caretaker Antispam continuously filters out more than 99% of all spam messages, while the number of false positives (genuine messages that are classified as spam) is virtually zero.

Hitman Pro 3 was released in 2008. The Hitman Pro 3 client is based completely on SurfRight technology.
Hitman Pro is a second opinion scanner, designed to rescue your computer from malware (viruses, trojans, rootkits, etc.) that have infected your computer despite all the security measures you have taken (such as anti virus software, firewalls, etc.). Hitman Pro is designed to work alongside existing security programs without any conflicts. It scans the computer quickly (less than 5 minutes) and does not slow down the computer (except for the few minutes it is scanning). Hitman Pro 3 does not need to be installed. It can be run straight from a USB flash drive, a CD/DVD, local or network attached hard drive

Source: http://www.bnettv.com/hitmanpro-surfright-mark-loman/

type 2 diabetes occupy congress juan williams victor martinez alcatraz cruise ship martin luther king jr.

The Weekly Winston: Post-Election Edition (Powerlineblog)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/262138759?client_source=feed&format=rss

andrej pejic naomi watts macaulay culkin steve jobs fbi safehouse brown recluse

Australia: The Great Barrier Reef | Peace is Our True Nature

Another extraordinary place. I did scuba dive there once. I remember slipping backwards into the water and my eyes were like goldfish bowls. I was looking for sharks, serves me right for watching Jaws in the 1980?s, however once I saw no fins coming towards me I relaxed and found myself in an oversized pool taking in a foreign world. It was wonderful to swim up to the reefs, see the fish peering at me like curious dogs, to see the corals like flowers blossoming. I could write poetry on this as I recall the incredible beauty all around me. I remember these huge sunfish, so colourful gently gliding around the reef pecking at the foods sources. I was struck by the incredible beauty of the reef and the delicate balance this ecosystem has. It is in danger of being destroyed by the Crown of Thorn starfish which has multipled exponentially. The cause of this infestation is human nutrients (fertiliser runoff flowing into the ocean) which aids starfish survival. The crown of thorn starfish have been destroying this 20,000 year old reef over the last 30 years. It is estimated that half of it may be gone, including cyclone damage. Hence devastating intrusion through agriculture catalyses another tipping point, crating an imbalance with the coral reef. This is the reality of tipping point.

We really don?t know much about nature, even our finest minds have their expertise, but no-one has a holistic vision which can take in the complex interconnections and sensitive feedbacks which constitute a living ecosystem. It is not just climate change, it is an integrated system and we haven?t even begun to understand human impact on such a delicate system. Narrow minds just see resources or a dumping ground for oil (oil tankers) they have no concept of the beauty and integration of nature with ourselves or even as a reflection of ourselves. Floating with this tank on my back and the sound of my own breathing loudly reminding me I depend on air, enabled me to gain a glimpse into another world that has never left me. My visit enabled myself to remember my connection to nature as it allowed me to swim amongst forests that are 110 million years old. That is the great in Great Barrier Reef. It is the largest coral reef in the world. It is breathtaking, particularly if you don?t wear your tank (bit of humour there).

So without further a do, here is Wikipedias rundown of this indeed Greatest of Barrier Reef?s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Barrier_Reef

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Great Barrier Reef is the world?s largest coral reef system[1][2] composed of over 2,900 individual reefs[3] and 900 islands stretching for over 2,600?kilometres (1,600?mi) over an area of approximately 344,400 square kilometres (133,000?sq?mi).[4][5] The reef is located in the Coral Sea, off the coast of Queensland, Australia.

The Great Barrier Reef can be seen from outer space and is the world?s biggest single structure made by living organisms.[6] This reef structure is composed of and built by billions of tiny organisms, known as coral polyps.[7] It supports a wide diversity of life and was selected as a World Heritage Site in 1981.[1][2]CNN labeled it one of the seven natural wonders of the world.[8] The Queensland National Trust named it a state icon of Queensland.[9]

A large part of the reef is protected by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, which helps to limit the impact of human use, such as fishing and tourism. Other environmental pressures on the reef and its ecosystem include runoff, climate change accompanied by mass coral bleaching, and cyclic population outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns starfish. According to a study published on 1 October 2012 by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the reef has lost more than half its coral cover since 1985.[10]

The Great Barrier Reef has long been known to and used by the Aboriginal Australian and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and is an important part of local groups? cultures and spirituality. The reef is a very popular destination for tourists, especially in the Whitsunday Islands and Cairns regions. Tourism is an important economic activity for the region, generating $1?billion per year.[11]

Geology and geography

Satellite image of part of the Great Barrier Reef adjacent to the Queensland coastal areas of Airlie Beach and Mackay.

The Great Barrier Reef is a distinct feature of the East Australian Cordillera division. It includes the smaller Murray Islands.[12] It reaches from Torres Strait (between Bramble Cay, its northernmost island, and the south coast of Papua New Guinea) in the north to the unnamed passage between Lady Elliot Island (its southernmost island) and Fraser Island in the south. Lady Elliot Island is located 1,915?km (1,190?mi) southeast of Bramble Cay as the crow flies.[13]

Australia has moved northwards at a rate of 7?cm (2.8?in) per year, starting during the Cainozoic.[14] Eastern Australia experienced a period of tectonic uplift, which moved the drainage divide in Queensland 400?km (250?mi) inland. Also during this time, Queensland experienced volcanic eruptions leading to central and shield volcanoes and basalt flows.[15] Some of these granitic outcrops have become high islands.[16] After the Coral Sea Basin formed, coral reefs began to grow in the Basin, but until about 25 million years ago, northern Queensland was still in temperate waters south of the tropics?too cool to support coral growth.[17] The Great Barrier Reef?s development history is complex; after Queensland drifted into tropical waters, it was largely influenced by reef growth and decline as sea level changed.[18] Reefs can increase in diameter by 1 to 3 centimetres (0.39 to 1.2 in) per year, and grow vertically anywhere from 1 to 25 cm (0.39 to 9.8 in) per year; however, they grow only above a depth of 150 metres (490?ft) due to their need for sunlight, and cannot grow above sea level.[19] When Queensland edged into tropical waters 24 million years ago, some coral grew,[20] but a sedimentation regime quickly developed with erosion of the Great Dividing Range; creating river deltas, oozes and turbidites, unsuitable conditions for coral growth. 10 million years ago, the sea level significantly lowered, which further enabled sedimentation. The reef?s substrate may have needed to build up from the sediment until its edge was too far away for suspended sediments to inhibit coral growth. In addition, approximately 400,000 years ago there was a particularly warm interglacial period with higher sea levels and a 4 ?C (7??F) water temperature change.[21]

The Great Barrier Reef is clearly visible from aircraft flying over it.

Heron Island, a coral cay in the southern Great Barrier Reef

The land that formed the substrate of the current Great Barrier Reef was a coastal plain formed from the eroded sediments of the Great Dividing Range with some larger hills (some of which were themselves remnants of older reefs[22] or volcanoes[16]).[14] The Reef Research Centre, a Cooperative Research Centre, has found coral ?skeleton? deposits that date back half a million years.[23] The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) considers the earliest evidence of complete reef structures to have been 600,000 years ago.[24] According to the GBRMPA, the current, living reef structure is believed to have begun growing on the older platform about 20,000 years ago.[24] The Australian Institute of Marine Science agrees, placing the beginning of the growth of the current reef at the time of the Last Glacial Maximum. At around that time, sea level was 120 metres (390?ft) lower than it is today.[22]

From 20,000 years ago until 6,000 years ago, sea level rose steadily. As it rose, the corals could then grow higher on the hills of the coastal plain. By around 13,000 years ago the sea level was only 60 metres (200?ft) lower than the present day, and corals began to grow around the hills of the coastal plain, which were, by then, continental islands. As the sea level rose further still, most of the continental islands were submerged. The corals could then overgrow the hills, to form the present cays and reefs. Sea level here has not risen significantly in the last 6,000 years.[22] The CRC Reef Research Centre estimates the age of the present, living reef structure at 6?8,000 years old.[23]

The remains of an ancient barrier reef similar to the Great Barrier Reef can be found in The Kimberley, Western Australia.[25]

The Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area has been divided into 70 bioregions,[26] of which 30 are reef bioregions.[27][28] In the northern part of the Great Barrier Reef, ribbon reefs and deltaic reefs have formed; these structures are not found in the rest of the reef system.[23] There are no atolls in the system,[29] and reefs attached to the mainland are rare.[14]

Fringing reefs are distributed widely, but are most common towards the southern part of the Great Barrier Reef, attached to high islands, for example, the Whitsunday Islands. Lagoonal reefs are found in the southern Great Barrier Reef, and further north, off the coast of Princess Charlotte Bay. Cresentic reefs are the most common shape of reef in the middle of the system, for example the reefs surrounding Lizard Island. Cresentic reefs are also found in the far north of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, and in the Swain Reefs (20?22 degrees south). Planar reefs are found in the northern and southern parts, near Cape York Peninsula, Princess Charlotte Bay, and Cairns. Most of the islands on the reef are found on planar reefs.[30]

Ecology

A variety of colourful corals on Flynn Reef near Cairns

The Great Barrier Reef supports a diversity of life, including many vulnerable or endangered species, some of which may be endemic to the reef system.[31][32]

Thirty species of whales, dolphins, and porpoises have been recorded in the Great Barrier Reef, including the dwarf minke whale, Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin, and the humpback whale. Large populations of dugongs live there.[32][33][34] More than 1,500 fish species live on the reef, including the clownfish, red bass, red-throat emperor, and several species of snapper and coral trout.[33] Forty-nine species mass spawn, while eighty-four other species spawn elsewhere in their range.[35] Seventeen species of sea snake live on the Great Barrier Reef in warm waters up to 50 metres (160?ft) deep and are more common in the southern than in the northern section. None found in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area are endemic, nor are any endangered.[36]

Six species of sea turtles come to the reef to breed ? the green sea turtle, leatherback sea turtle, hawksbill turtle, loggerhead sea turtle, flatback turtle, and the olive ridley. The green sea turtles on the Great Barrier Reef have two genetically distinct populations, one in the northern part of the reef and the other in the southern part.[37] Fifteen species of seagrass in beds attract the dugongs and turtles,[33] and provide fish habitat.[38] The most common genera of seagrasses are Halophila and Halodule.[39]

Saltwater crocodiles live in mangrove and salt marshes on the coast near the reef.[40] Nesting has not been reported, and the salt water crocodile population in the GBRWHA is wide-ranging but low density.[36] Around 125 species of shark, stingray, skates or chimaera live on the reef.[41][42] Close to 5,000 species of mollusc have been recorded on the reef, including the giant clam and various nudibranchs and cone snails.[33] Forty-nine species of pipefish and nine species of seahorse have been recorded.[36] At least seven species of frog inhabit the islands.[43]

215 species of birds (including 22 species of seabirds and 32 species of shorebirds) visit the reef or nest or roost on the islands,[44] including the white-bellied sea eagle and roseate tern.[33] Most nesting sites are on islands in the northern and southern regions of the Great Barrier Reef, with 1.4?1.7?million birds using the sites to breed.[45][46] The islands of the Great Barrier Reef also support 2,195 known plant species; three of these are endemic. The northern islands have 300?350 plant species which tend to be woody, whereas the southern islands have 200 which tend to be herbaceous; the Whitsunday region is the most diverse, supporting 1,141 species. The plants are propagated by birds.[43]

There are at least 330 species of ascidians on the reef system with the diameter of 1?10 cm (0.4?4 in). Between 300?500 species of bryozoans live on the reef.[42] Four hundred coral species, both hard corals and soft corals inhabit the reef.[33] The majority of these spawn gametes, breeding in mass spawning events that are triggered by the rising sea temperatures of spring and summer, the lunar cycle, and the diurnal cycle. Reefs in the inner Great Barrier Reef spawn during the week after the full moon in October, while the outer reefs spawn in November and December.[47] Its common soft corals belong to 36 genera.[48] Five hundred species of marine algae or seaweed live on the reef,[33] including thirteen species of genus Halimeda, which deposit calcareous mounds up to 100 metres (110?yd) wide, creating mini-ecosystems on their surface which have been compared to rainforest cover.[49]

Environmental threats

Sea temperature and bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef

Climate change, pollution, crown-of-thorns starfish and fishing are the primary threats to the health of this reef system. Other threats include shipping accidents, oil spills, and tropical cyclones.[50]Skeletal Eroding Band, a disease of bony corals caused by the protozoan Halofolliculina corallasia, affects 31 coral species.[51] According to a 2012 study by the National Academy of Science, since 1985, the Great Barrier Reef has lost more than half of its corals with two-thirds of the lost occurring from 1998 due to the factors listed before.[52]

Climate change

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority considers the greatest threat to the Great Barrier Reef to be climate change, causing ocean warming which increases coral bleaching.[53][54][55] Mass coral bleaching events due to elevated ocean temperatures occurred in the summers of 1998, 2002 and 2006,[56] and coral bleaching is expected to become an annual occurrence.[57] As global warming continues due to anthropogenic causes, corals will not be able to keep up with increasing ocean temperatures. Coral bleaching events lead to increased disease susceptibility, which causes detrimental ecological effects for reef communities.[58] Climate change has implications for other forms of reef life?some fish?s preferred temperature range leads them to seek new habitat, thus increasing chick mortality in predatory seabirds. Climate change will also affect the population and sea turtle?s available habitat.[59]

Bleaching events in benthic coral communities (deeper than 20 metres?/ 66 feet) in the Great Barrier reef are not as well documented as those at shallower depths, but recent research has shown that benthic communities are just as negatively impacted in the face of rising ocean temperatures. Five Great Barrier Reef species of large benthic corals were found bleached under elevated temperatures, affirming that benthic corals are vulnerable to thermal stress.[60]

Pollution

Another key threat faced by the Great Barrier Reef is pollution and declining water quality. The rivers of north eastern Australia pollute the Reef during tropical flood events. Over 90% of this pollution comes from farm runoff.[61] Farm run-off is caused by overgrazing, excessive fertiliser use, and pesticide use.

The runoff problem is exacerbated by the loss of coastal wetlands which act as a natural filter for toxins and help deposit sediment.[62][63][64] It is thought that the poor water quality is due to increased light and oxygen competition from algae.[65]

Crown of thorns

The crown-of-thorns starfish preys on coral polyps. Large outbreaks of these starfish can devastate reefs. In 2000, an outbreak contributed to a loss of 66% of live coral cover on sampled reefs in a study by the RRC (Reefs Research Centre.)[66] Outbreaks are believed to occur in natural cycles, worsened by poor water quality and overfishing of the starfish?s predators.[66][67]

Fishing

The unsustainable overfishing of keystone species, such as the Giant Triton, can disrupt food chains vital to reef life. Fishing also impacts the reef through increased water pollution from boats, by-catch of unwanted species (such as dolphins and turtles) and habitat destruction from trawling, anchors and nets.[68] As of the middle of 2004, approximately one-third of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park is protected from species removal of any kind, including fishing, without written permission.[69]

Shipping

The Shen Neng 1 aground on the Great Barrier Reef, 5 April 2010.

Shipping accidents are a pressing concern, as several commercial shipping routes pass through the Great Barrier Reef.[70] Although the route through the Great Barrier Reef is not easy, reef pilots consider it safer than outside the reef in the event of mechanical failure, since a ship can sit safely while being repaired.[71] There have been over 1,600?known shipwrecks in the Great Barrier Reef region.[72] On 3 April 2010, bulk coal carrier Shen Neng 1 ran aground on Douglas Shoals,[73]spilling up to four tonnes of oil into the water and causing extensive damage to the reef.[74]

Human use

The Great Barrier Reef has long been known to and used by the Aboriginal Australian and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Aboriginal Australians have been living in the area for at least 40,000 years,[75] and Torres Strait Islanders since about 10,000 years ago.[76] For these 70 or so clan groups, the reef is also an important cultural feature.[77]

In 1768, Louis de Bougainville found the reef during an exploratory mission, but did not claim the area for the French.[78] On 11 June 1770, the HM Bark Endeavour, captained by explorer James Cook, ran aground on the Great Barrier Reef, sustaining considerable damage. Lightening the ship and re-floating it during an incoming tide eventually saved it.[79] One of the most famous wrecks was the HMS Pandora, which sank on 29 August 1791, killing 35 men. The Queensland Museum has led archaeological digs to the Pandora since 1983.[80] Because the reef had no atolls, it was largely unstudied in the 19th century.[29] During this time, some of the reef?s islands were mined for deposits of guano, and lighthouses were built as beacons throughout the system.[81] as in Raine Island, the earliest example.[82] In 1922, the Great Barrier Reef Committee began carrying out much of the early research on the reef.[83]

Starfish on coral. Tourists often photograph the natural beauty of the reef.

Management

Royal Commissions disallowed oil drilling in the Great Barrier Reef, in 1975 the Government of Australia created the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and prohibited various activities.[84] The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park does not include the entire Great Barrier Reef Province.[13] The park is managed, in partnership with the Government of Queensland, through the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority to ensure that it is used in a sustainable manner. A combination of zoning, management plans, permits, education and incentives (such as eco-tourism certification) are employed in the effort to conserve the reef.[50][85]

In 1999, the Australian Parliament passed the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act which improved the operation of national environmental law by providing guidance about regional biodiversity conservation priorities. The marine bioregional planning process came from the implementation of this law. This process conserves marine biodiversity by considering the whole ecosystem a species is in and how different species interact in the marine environment.

There are two steps to this process. The first step is to identify regional conservation priorities in the five (currently) different marine regions. The second step is to identify marine reserves (protected areas or marine parks) to be added to Australia?s National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas. Like protected areas on land, marine reserves are created to protect biodiversity for generations to come. Marine reserves are identified based on criteria written in a document created by Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council entitled ?Guidelines for establishing the national representative system of marine protected areas,? also known as just ?the Guidelines.? These guidelines are nationally recognised and implemented at the local level based on the Australian policy for implementation outlined in the ?Goals and Principles for the Establishment of the National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas in Commonwealth Waters.? These policies are in place to make sure that a marine reserve is only added to the NRSMPA after careful evaluation of different data.

The priorities for each region are created based on human and environmental threats and the Marine Bioregional Plans are drafted to address these priorities. To assess different region?s priorities, three steps are taken, first, a bioregional profile is created, second, a bioregional plan is drafted and third, the plan is finalised. After the plan is finalized, activity in different bioregions may become limited based on particular threats an activity may pose.[86]

In 2001, the GBRMPA released a report about the declining water quality in the Great Barrier Reef and detailed the importance of this issue. In repose to this report a joint initiative between the governments of Australia and Queensland to improve the water quality of the Great Barrier Reef. In 2003, the Australian and Queensland governments launched a joint initiative to improve the quality of water entering the Great Barrier Reef. The decline in the quality of water over the past 150 years (due to development) has contributed to coral bleaching, algal blooms and pesticide pollution. These forms of pollution have made the reef less resilient to climate change. When the plan was introduced in October in 2003, it originally contained 65 actions built on previous legislation. Their immediate goal was to halt and reverse the decline in water quality entering the reef by 2013. By 2020, they hope that the quality of the water entering in the reef improves enough so that it doesn?t have a detrimental impact on the health of the Great Barrier Reef. To achieve these goals they decided to reduce pollutants in the water entering the reef and to rehabilitate and conserve areas of the reef that naturally help reduce water pollutants. In order to achieve the objectives described above, this plan focuses on non-point sources of pollution, which cannot be traced to a single source such as a waste outlet.

The plan specifically targets nutrients, pesticides and sediment that make their way into the reef as a result of agricultural activities. Other non-point sources of pollution that are attributed to urban areas are covered under different legislation. In 2009 the plan was updated. The updated version states that to date, none of the efforts undertaken to improve the quality of water entering the reef has been successful. The new plan attempts to address this issue by ?targeting priority outcomes, integrating industry and community initiatives and incorporating new policy and regulatory frameworks (Reef Plan 5).? This updated version has improved the clarity of the previous plan and targets set by that plan, have improved accountability and further improved monitoring and assessment. The 2009 report found that 41 out of the 65 actions met their original goals, however, 18 were not progressing well according to evaluation criteria as well as 6 were rated as having unsatisfactory levels of progress. Some key achievements made since the plan?s initial passing in 2003 were the establishment of the Reef Quality Partnership to set targets, report findings and monitor progress towards targets, improved land condition by landowners was rewarded with extended leases, Water Quality Improvement Plans were created to identify regional targets and identified management changes that needed to be made to reach those targets, Nutrient Management Zones have been created to combat sediment loss in particular areas, education programs have been started to help gather support for sustainable agriculture, changes to land management practices have taken place through the implementation of the Farm Management Systems and codes of practice, the creation of the Queensland Wetland program and other achievements were made to help improve the water quality flowing into the coral reefs.

A taskforce of scientists was also created to assess the impact of different parts of the plan on the quality of water flowing into the coral reefs. They found that many of the goals have yet to be reached but found more evidence that states that improving the water quality of the Great Barrier Reef will improve its resilience to climate change. The Reefocus summit in 2008, which is also detailed in the report, came to similar conclusions. After this, a stakeholder working group was formed that worked between several groups as well as the Australian and Queensland governments to update reef goals and objectives. The updated version of the plan focuses on strategic priority areas and actions to achieve 2013 goals. Also quantitative targets have been made in order to critically assess whether targets are being met. Some examples of the water quality goals outlined by this plan are that by 2013, there will be a 50% reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus loads at the end of catchments and that by 2020, there will be a reduction in sediment load by 20%. The plan also outlines a number of steps that must be taken by landholders to help improve grazing, soil, nutrient and chemical management practices. There are also a number of supporting initiatives to take place outlined in the plan to help create a framework to improve land use practices which will in turn improve water quality.

Through these means the governments of Australia and Queensland hope to improve water quality by 2013. The 2013 outlook report and revised water quality plan will assess what needs to be done in the future to improve water quality and the livelihoods of the wildlife that resides there.[87]

In July 2004, a new zoning plan took effect for the entire Marine Park, and has been widely acclaimed as a new global benchmark for marine ecosystem conservation.[88] The rezoning was based on the application of systematic conservation planning techniques, using MARXAN software.[89] While protection across the Marine Park was improved, the highly protected zones increased from 4.5% to over 33.3%.[90] At the time, it was the largest marine protected area in the world, although in 2006, the new Northwestern Hawaiian Islands National Monument became the largest.[91]

In 2006, a review of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 recommended are that there should be no further zoning plan changes until 2013, and that every five years, a peer-reviewed Outlook Report should be published, examining the reef?s health, management, and environmental pressures.[5][92] In each outlook report, several assessments are required. Each assessment has a set of assessment criteria that allows for better presentation of available evidence. Each assessment is judged by these criteria and given a grade. Every outlook report follows the same judging and grading process so that information can be tracked over time. No new research is done to produce the report. Only readily available information goes into the report so little of what is known about the Reef is actually featured in each outlook report.[93]

Tourism

Due to its vast biodiversity, warm clear waters and accessibility from the tourist boats called ?live aboards?, the reef is a very popular destination, especially for scuba divers. Tourism on the Great Barrier Reef is concentrated in the Whitsundays and Cairns due to their accessibility. These areas make up 7% of the Park?s area.[50] The Whitsundays and Cairns have their own Plans of Management.[94] Many cities along the Queensland coast offer daily boat trips. Several continental and coral cay islands are now resorts, including the pristine Lady Elliot Island. As of 1996, 27 islands on the Great Barrier Reef supported resorts.[50]

Domestic tourism made up most of the tourism in the region as of 1996, and the most popular visiting times were in the Australian winter. It was estimated that tourists to the Great Barrier Reef contributed A$776?million per annum at this time.[95]

As the largest commercial activity in the region, it was estimated in 2003 that tourism in the Great Barrier Reef generates over A$4?billion annually.[96] (A 2005 estimate puts the figure at A$5.1?billion.[94]) Approximately two million people visit the Great Barrier Reef each year.[97] Although most of these visits are managed in partnership with the marine tourism industry, there is a concern amongst the general public that tourism is harmful to the Great Barrier Reef.[50]

A variety of boat tours and cruises are offered, from single day trips, to longer voyages. Boat sizes range from dinghies to superyachts.[98]Glass-bottomed boats and underwater observatories are also popular, as are helicopter flights.[99][100] By far, the most popular tourist activities on the Great Barrier Reef are snorkelling and diving, for which pontoons are often used, and the area is often enclosed by nets. The outer part of the Great Barrier Reef is favoured for such activities, due to water quality.

Management of tourism in the Great Barrier Reef is geared towards making tourism ecologically sustainable. A daily fee is levied that goes towards research of the Great Barrier Reef.[94] This fee ends up being 20% of the GBRMPA?s income.[101] Policies on cruise ships, bareboat charters, and anchorages limit the traffic on the Great Barrier Reef.[94]

The problems that surround ecotourism in the Great Barrier Reef revolve around permanent tourism platforms. Platforms are large, ship-like vessels that act as a base for tourists while scuba diving and snorkeling in the Great Barrier Reef. Seabirds will land on the platforms and defecate which will eventually be washed into the sea. The feces carry nitrogen, phosphorus and oftentimes DDT and mercury which cause aspergillosis,yellow band disease and black band disease. Areas without tourism platforms have 14 out of 9,468 (1.1%) diseased corals versus areas with tourism platforms that have 172 out of 7,043 (12%) diseased corals.[102] Tourism is a major economic activity for the region. Thus, while non-permanent platforms could be possible in some areas, overall, permanent platforms are likely a necessity. Solutions have been suggested to siphon bird waste into gutters connecting to tanks helping lower runoff that causes coral disease.[103]

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has also placed many permanent anchorage points around the general use areas. These act to reduce damage to the reef due to anchoring destroying soft coral, chipping hard coral and disturbing sediment as it is dragged across the bottom. Tourism operators also must comply with speed limits when traveling to or from tourist destinations, in order to prevent excessive wake from the boats disturbing the reef ecosystem.

Fishing

The fishing industry in the Great Barrier Reef, controlled by the Queensland Government, is worth A$1?billion annually.[11] It employs approximately 2000 people, and fishing in the Great Barrier Reef is pursued commercially, for recreation, and as a traditional means for feeding one?s family.[77]

Dugong Hunting

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities that inhabit the reef have hunted dugongs well before European settlement. The dugong meat was often used in marriage and tombstone unveiling ceremonies, and the skull was used in the coming of age rites. As part of the Indigenous Management practices, the Marine Park Authority has allowed the hunting to continue around several Pacific Islander communities. However, the rapid increase in Dugong deaths has led to a controversy regarding the practices, as outboard motors are being used to kill up to one thousand dugongs a year, over ten times the sustainable level. Refrigeration of the meat now allows multiple carcasses to be kept ready for extended periods. This has led to debate between the Marine Park Authority and the scientific community regarding the merits of Indigenous practices in the reef.

Source: http://wpas.worldpeacefull.com/2012/11/australia-the-great-barrier-reef/

the fray seahawks new uniforms 2012 tornadoes in dallas anchorman 2 kentucky basketball oaksterdam the fray national anthem

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Mount Diablo Unified Community Advisory Committee on Special ...

Mount Diablo Unified Community Advisory Committee on Special Education: Muscular Dystrophy is Just Part of Their Lives - The Markell Family - Our Special Life

Muscular Dystrophy is Just Part of Their Lives - The Markell Family - Our Special Life

From CafeMomStudios

Sophie has a rare form of muscular dystrophy called Emery-Dreifuss. She is celebrating her 13th Birthday and is Vice President of her student council! She has incredible control over her feet and is able to paint and play computer and Wii games with her right foot.



Source: http://mtdiablosped.blogspot.com/2012/11/muscular-dystrophy-is-just-part-of.html

PNC Bank Jordan Pruitt real housewives of new jersey act Kanye West sex tape emmys emmys

Saturday, November 10, 2012

The Legal Infrastructure of Business: Empty Bottle

Background

The Associated Press reported on Monday that brewer Anheuser-Busch asked Paramount Pictures Corp. to either blur or take out?its Budweiser logo from the new film ?Flight?.? In the movie, Denzel Washington?s character is a high-functioning alcoholic who miraculously lands a crashing plane while under the influence of alcohol.? Denzel?s character is seen drinking Budweiser throughout the film.? Anheuser-Busch is upset with this association and is?worried about the negative advertising effects.? Rob McCarthy, VP of Budweiser is quoted as saying, ?We would never condone the misuse of our products, and have a long history of promoting responsible drinking and preventing drunk driving.?

Anheuser-Busch has asked Paramount to remove its Budweiser label from all current digital copies as well as all future adaptations of the film.? This request brings about the potential for a lawsuit.? Trademark lawsuits much like this have been seen in the past; however, courts typically side with the studios in cases like these.? In 2003, Paramount won a case against the makers of ?Slip ?N Slide?.? The movie "Flight" also shows several other brands of alcohol consumed throught the film.

It is believed that the current trend of product placement, where a company pays a production company to use its product, has companies who are owners of trademarks confused.? Trademark laws do not grant control to companies of the use of their products in films or television. In fact, the use of trademarked products is protected under several limitations including federal ?fair use? laws. In order to win a suit brought against Paramount, Anheuser-Busch would have to prove two things.? First, it would have to prove that the use of the product in the film was authorized and second that the audience associated the product with the film ?Flight? and the alcoholic character.

Thoughts

This story is of particular interest due to the noticeable increase of product placement in films.? Most times, companies secure lucrative deals with studios in order to feature their products.? If featured positively, the product gets good association and advertising. In fact, some television shows even go to the extreme of obscuring the image of some products in their shows because the company has not paid them to use the product in their show.

In cases where the company pays the studio, the company should be protected under the law to not have its trademarked product negatively represented.? The exchange of money is an implied-in-fact contract and obligates the studio to perform. The more difficult question to answer is when no implied-in-fact contract comes into play.?

By definition, an owner of a trademark may initiate legal proceedings for trademark infringement.? Trademark infringement can occur when a second party misuses or misrepresents what the trademarked product intends.? However, as mentioned above the company (Paramount Pictures in this case) using the trademarked product is protected under the ?fair use? defense.? ?Fair use? is affirmed when the defendant is using the trademark to accurately depict the uses of its product or when the defendant is using the trademark to identify the owner.? The truth is that Budweiser beer can be consumed by alcoholics.? I believe that Paramount is protected here under "fair use".

This story provides the other side of the Tim Tebow article on trademarks posted earlier.? It brings up the point, aside from what he trademarked, that non-owners of trademarks are protected under several limits and defenses to claims of infringement. It turns out, perhaps?more people will be able to Tebow than we thought, be it good or bad news.

?

Sources:

http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/11/07/budweiser-wants-to-be-removed-from-paramounts-flight/

http://ca.movies.yahoo.com/blogs/wide-screen/flight-budweider-product-placement-gone-wrong-200352757.html

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/apnewsbreak-budweiser-seeks-removal-flight

?

Source: http://picker.typepad.com/legalinfrastructure/2012/11/empty-bottle.html

brandon inge freedom tower freedom tower eric church world trade center quick silver where have you been rihanna

As New Jersey Votes by Email, Security Questions Linger

Slide Show

Email and Information Security Trends 2012

During a lull at the polls on Tuesday, where I was handing out blank ballots to voters, the discussion of voting by email came up. The reason was logical: A college woman came into our polling station distraught because she wanted to make it home to vote in person, but a tree fell onto her parents? home during Superstorm Sandy. Even if she did go home, there was no place for her to stay and she wasn?t even sure where she?d be voting. It was too late for an absentee ballot and was there anything else she could do? Would she be allowed to vote by email like they could across the river from her home, in New Jersey?

We tried to help the young woman ? I have no idea if she was ever able to vote ? but it did spur the conversation of whether or not we should be able to vote by email. While everyone else in the room said yes, I was wary. I don?t trust the security, I said. All you need to do is take a look at the news this year and see the number of government entities that have been hacked into or had major security failures. I?m not sure how secure my vote would be. And that doesn?t include the phishing scams that could lead to malware or even to the concerns over computerized voting in polling places or the fraud in creating fake email addresses or the countless other security matters.

According to a Washington Post story, experts share my concerns:

Charles Stewart, a professor of political science at MIT and co-director of the Caltech-MIT voting technology project, said security is a concern. If the military and major banks have been hacked into, e-mail servers for New Jersey can easily be hit with denial of service attacks.

Stewart?s concerns are echoed by Andrew Appel, a Princeton University computer science professor, who was quoted by USA Today:

Internet voting is inherently insecure ? and e-mail voting is the most insecure form of Internet voting. It's quite easy to fake an e-mail return address. E-mail voting is completely untrustworthy and insecure unless it's backed up by a paper ballot signed by the voter.

Email voting is used by 30 states, including New Jersey, primarily for overseas residents and deployed military. New Jersey normally requires a paper backup to validate the vote sent electronically from overseas, and some experts believe that having a paper backup makes the vote more secure. However, the paper ballot is being bypassed during this unusual time, putting the issue of email voting security front and center in major media outlets.

I bring up this issue after the elections because email security is more than a voting-related issue. Email security should be a commonplace discussion, and not only government, but businesses and other organizations should be regularly exploring ways to make email more secure. We should encourage this current discussion to continue, especially as the holiday shopping season approaches and the tips and advice on how to stay safe on Cyber Monday hit my inbox. Email security is a problem every day, not just on special occasions.

Source: http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/data-security/as-new-jersey-votes-by-email-security-questions-linger.html

snooki pregnant gbc hedy lamarr jack white kowloon walled city ronda rousey vs miesha tate lindsay lohan snl

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Observatory: The Trick to the Archer Fish?s Powerful Attack

To capture their prey ? a spider or insect, often sitting on branches above the water ? archer fish spit out a powerful jet of water. The jet knocks the prey off and the fish race to capture their dinner.

?When the jet hits a solid surface you can hear a loud knock that?s very impressive because the fish are very small,? said Alberto Vailati, a physicist at the University of Milan.

Just how the fish generate a stream of water powerful enough to detach prey from vegetation has been a mystery. Now Dr. Vailati and his colleagues say the fish are able to modulate the velocity of the water coming out of their mouths. They increase the velocity over time and the water builds up as it is spit out in a continuous stream.

?You have this drop of water that progressively increases in size over time, and gets inflated,? Dr. Vailati said.

This large drop of water is then able to hit and knock down prey with incredible force.

Dr. Vailati and his colleagues studied the fish, which are found in South and Southeast Asia, Australia and Polynesia, with a high-speed video camera. Previously, researchers had speculated that archer fish had some sort of special muscle in the mouth to enable the powerful jet of water. That hypothesis was disproved.

The technique used by the fish resembles something called water jet cutting, Dr. Vailati said, in which jets of water cut through metal. He and his colleagues report their findings in the current issue of the journal PLoS One.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/science/the-technique-behind-an-archer-fishs-powerful-attack.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

braxton miller Whitney Heichel Tippi Hedren Big Tex Sweetest Day optimal Samantha Steele Espn

'Suits,' 'White Collar,' 'Necessary Roughness' Get January Return Dates

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"7664811","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-1106004047", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-1106004047", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "7664811", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "7664811" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });

The science of Halloween's scariest creatures

Ooooowwwoooo! Werewolves, zombies and good old-fashioned ghosts may pop out of the crypt tonight, but Halloween's creepiest staples didn't just appear out of thin air. Many of them once instilled real fear in medieval towns, when folklore reigned supreme and getting freaked out came easy.

Here are some real science and history tales of the scary stars of Oct. 31.

1. Jack-o'-lanterns
A standout among freaks and monsters, the nutritious pumpkin may be Halloween's most famous symbol. The practice of carving and lighting the gourd is a Celtic custom brought to America by Irish immigrants, who used the more-plentiful turnip back home. Glowing, frightening faces emanating from the pumpkins were meant to frighten off the evil spirits thought to roam the streets on Oct. 31, the Celtic New Year's Eve. [In Images: Peculiar Halloween Pumpkins]

2. Bats
They're blind, they hang out in caves and they inspire masked crusaders. But how did bats become associated with Halloween? The winged mammals can thank vampires for that. Like their Draculian counterparts, a small number of bat species actually subsist on animal blood ? vampire bats have been known to attack humans on occasion ? using sharp teeth to cut into the sleeping victim. Their nocturnal ways frightful appearances probably don't help either.

3. Gargoyles
They're one way to add a little freaky je ne sais quoi to otherwise lovely architecture. But gargoyles, those frightening stone monsters protruding from cathedrals worldwide, do actually have a function. They were incorporated into gothic stonework as early as the 13th century to keep rain water off cathedral roofs, their mouths serving as the ejector spout. More spiritually, gargoyles were supposed to protect the congregation from the ever-present evil forces lurking outside. Killing two birds with one stone, so to speak.

  1. Science news from NBCNews.com

    1. Scientists foresaw storm's flood ? but now what?

      Science editor Alan Boyle's blog: Researchers have issued warnings for years that the New York metro area was susceptible to a catastrophic storm surge, but they don't feel any better about it now that they've been proven right.

    2. Storm kills legions of NYU lab mice
    3. Subway rats may flood NYC streets
    4. The science of Halloween's scariest creatures

4. Goblins
Made famous in fairy tales, the small and furry goblin is more mischievous than menacing. Legend tells of goblins hiding out in forests, pulling pranks and sometimes switching human babies for their own changeling spawn. Unlike some of the other creatures mentioned here and probably because of their disconnect from religion, goblins never quite crossed the threshold from the imaginary to cause real panic in medieval towns. [ 10 Beasts and Dragons: How Reality Made Myth ]

5. Witches
Forget the pointy black hat and warty nose. Those popular associations are relatively recent compared with the long and often tragic history of witches across the globe. In the past, witches were thought to possess magical powers connected with the natural world. Like all pagans, they were demonized as heretics by the Christian church, a hunt that reached its apex in medieval Europe and 17th-century America. Good luck picking them out of a crowd today: Witch costumes frequently top the list at Halloween.

6. Zombies
Kings of the B-movie industry, zombies are individuals who've either had their souls sucked from their bodies or been revived from the dead through black magic. Zombie culture stems from the voodoo religion of Haiti, where it is still believed that people can fall into mindless trances just like the walking dead we've seen on film (minus the missing limbs and snacking on human flesh). An ethnobotanist investigating the claims in Haiti found a toxic drug that could actually induce a zombie-style catatonic state.

7. Ghosts
Poke two eyeholes into a bed sheet and you've got the easiest Halloween costume around. Becoming a real ghost is a bit more complicated. First you have to die, maybe tragically, then leave part of your soul hanging around Earth to spook relatives and haunt houses. From a supposedly scientific angle, parapsychologists argue that energy ? including what's in the body ? can never be completely destroyed. Society seems to agree: Various studies peg belief in ghosts at about 50 percent.

8. Werewolves
Typically normal and well-mannered until a full moon kicks in, werewolves are cursed shape-shifters that have appeared in the legend set of nearly every culture going back to ancient Greece. Like witches, they were hunted in medieval times and blamed for community murders that couldn't be explained otherwise. Though the violent werewolf stories of old seem to have fallen off the radar, except in Hollywood, there remains an excessive body-hair disorder lovingly nicknamed "the werewolf disease."

9. Vampires
They vant to suck your blood, and have for quite some time. Vampires have popped up in cultural folklore for thousands of years, though the fanged-and-coiffed version we know comes from the 18th- and 19th-century myths of Eastern Europe. There, it was believed that someone who was born with deformities or died an irregular death could, after burial, rise again to terrorize the living. Vampires were considered "undead" and needed to feast on human blood to remain so.

More substantial, remains of a woman with a brick shoved in her mouth (possibly to exorcise the corpse), lying in a 16th-century grave of plague victims in Italy, may be the first vampire burial known to archaeology. More recent research, however, questions the interpretation, suggesting the brick accidentally fell into the skull.

10. Demons
One of those all-encompassing terms for an "evil spirit," a demon can represent anything from a malevolent ghost or fallen angel to a puppet of Satan. Like the notion of evil itself, they have ancient origins and appear in folklore and literature across the world. The demon that possessed Linda Blair in "The Exorcist" is probably pop culture's most famous and most talented, with levitation capability, rotating head and amazing, lifelike spewing action!

Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience. We're also on Facebook? and Google+.

? 2012 LiveScience.com. All rights reserved.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49630340/ns/technology_and_science-science/

patrice oneal shamrock slainte the quiet man yellow cab dropkick murphys guernsey